Home For Pet Owners For Lawyers For Skeptics Forum About Us Contact Us Terms & Privacy Site Map Links
Up


Maine

Although we attempt to keep the web site updated, we cannot guarantee that the following is the most recent version of the statute in effect.  Please consult http://janus.state.me.us/legis/statutes/ for the Maine statutes online.

18-B M.R.S.A. §408.   Trust for care of animal.

1. To provide for animal; termination. A trust may be created to provide for the care of an animal alive during the settlor's lifetime.  The trust terminates upon the death of the animal or, if the trust was created to provide for the care of more than one animal alive during the settlor's lifetime, upon the death of the last surviving animal.

2. Enforcement.  A trust authorized by this section may be enforced by a person appointed in the terms of the trust or, if no person is so appointed, by a person appointed by the court.  A person having an interest in the welfare of the animal may request the court to appoint a person to enforce the trust or to remove a person appointed.

3. Intended use of property.   Property of a trust authorized by this section may be applied only to its intended use, except to the extent the court determines that the value of the trust property exceeds the amount required for the intended use. Except as otherwise provided in the terms of the trust, property not required for the intended use must be distributed to the settlor, if then living, otherwise, to the settlor's successors in interest.

The following are the "Maine Comments" that appear in the text of the enacting bill:

This section is new Maine law.  The question of the validity of a trust for the care of a specific animal or animals has not previously been addressed in Maine.  These types of arrangements are distinguishable from trusts having broader objectives such as the prevention of cruelty to animals or the benefit of animals generally such as through the maintenance of wildlife sanctuaries or animal habitat.  Maine case law has indirectly addressed the question of whether arrangements for the care of animals generally qualify as charitable activities.  See, e.g., Holbrook Island Sanctuary v. Inhabitants of Town of Brooksville, 214 A.2d 660, 161 Me. 476 (1965), a case concerning the charitable exemption for property taxes.  Citing the Restatement (Second) of Trusts, Section 374 (1959), the Law Court stated:  "A trust to prevent or alleviate the suffering of animals is charitable.  Thus, a trust for the prevention of cruelty to animals, or a trust to establish a home for animals, or a trust for the prevention or cure or treatment of diseases or of injuries to animals, is charitable." However, the Law Court held that the operation of a wildlife sanctuary or preserve was not a charitable purpose.

Section 408 does not address these broader animal-related and wildlife-related arrangements, but section 409 may be applicable to those animal-related activities that do not qualify as charitable in nature.

(L.D. 921, effective July 1, 2005.)