Home For Pet Owners For Lawyers For Skeptics Forum About Us Contact Us Terms & Privacy Site Map Links

Tax Considerations

Up to Legal Primer Outline               To Previous Section                      To Next Section

A.        Federal taxation of transfer of pet and caretaking funds to caretaker or trustee

1.       Federal income taxation

In general, the receipt of funds and other property (i.e., pet animal) by gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance is not subject to federal income taxation.  In other words, there is no income taxable event merely because the pet and/or certain caretaking funds pass to a caretaker or a trust for the care of an animal.  What happens when the caretaking funds earn interest or dividends within the trust is an entirely different question (discussed below).

2.        Federal estate and gift taxation

Under current federal uniform transfer tax law, a decedent may, through a combination of taxable gifts made during the decedent’s lifetime or passing at death through the decedent’s “gross estate”, transfer up to a certain amount to nonspouse/noncharitable beneficiaries without incurring federal estate or gift taxes.  Under the current statute, for gift tax purposes, this "exemption" amount is $1 million.  For estate tax purposes, the exemption amount is currently $2 million, but will rise to $3.5 million in 2009; and in 2010, the estate tax is repealed, only to return again with a $1 million exemption in 2011.  Most estate planners posit that there will be some change in the law prior to 2010.

Within this general framework, it should be noted that any amount passing to a pet trust by reason of the settlor’s death will generally be included in the gross estate.  Under Revenue Ruling 78-105, 1978-1 CB 295, the IRS has ruled that no portion of the amount passing to a valid trust for the lifetime benefit of a pet qualifies for the charitable estate tax deduction, even if the remainder beneficiary is a qualifying charity.[1]  That said, the relatively wealthy pet owner should consider how the taxes attributable to such a trust should be paid under the federal and state apportionment rules.

B.        Federal income taxation of trust for pet

Revenue Ruling 76-486, 1976-2 CB 192 provides that if a trust for the benefit of an animal is valid under state law, then the trust itself will be subject to income taxation – not the caretaker-trustee or the pet animal.  If the net taxable income from the pet trust exceeds $100, the trustee is generally required to file a fiduciary income tax return (IRS Form 1041) and pay any income taxes.

1.        Who pays the income taxes

Under the federal income tax law, if the caretaker is considered the beneficiary of the trust (which is the case with a traditional legal trust for pets), then under IRC §661, the trust is entitled to deduct the amount of “distributable net income” paid out to the caretaker, and the caretaker is required to recognize this taxable income on his or her own income tax return.  When all is said and done, either the trustee or the caretaker pay the income taxes, depending on whether the taxable income is accumulated or distributed each year.  As a result, any trust provisions intending to make the caretaker whole should also take into account potential tax consequences.

Of course, a pet animal is not required to file or pay income taxes.  Thus, Revenue Ruling 76-486 provides that if the pet is considered the beneficiary of the trust (which appears to be an implicit assumption under the pet trust statutes), the trust receives no income distribution deduction for such distributions and would be required to pay income taxes with respect to any taxable income.  Nor would the trust qualify as a charitable trust, even if the remainder beneficiary is a qualifying charitable organization.[2]

2.       Deductibility of payments for the care of the pet

If the pet is considered property of the trust, an argument could be made that any expenditures made for care of a pet represent deductible trust administration expenses – reducing the amount of taxable income to either the trust or the caretaker-beneficiary.  IRC §212 allows a deduction for ordinary and necessary expenses incurred:  (a) for the production of income; (b) for the management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for the production of income; or (c) in connection with the determination, collection, or refund of any tax.   The accompanying regulations also state that a trustee may deduct expenses incurred “in connection with the performance of the duties of administration.”[3]  In practice, trustee fees and professional fees (e.g., attorneys, accountants, tax return preparation) are clearly deductible; but expenditures incurred for the care of a pet, which is not an income-producing asset and is not inextricably related to the normal business of administering a trust, are probably not deductible.


[1] The trust provided for an annual payment for the benefit of the pet during its lifetime with the remainder passing to the charity.  The IRS concluded that the trust would have been classified as a statutory charitable remainder trust, qualifying for a partial estate tax deduction under IRC §2055(a), if the annuity had been payable to a “person” and not a pet.  See IRC §7701(a)(1) (definition of “person”) and Regs. §§1.664-2(a)(3) and 1.664.3(a)(3) (requiring that term payments be made to a designated person or persons to qualify as a statutory charitable remainder trust). 

[2] See IRC §§170, 664, and 7701(a)(1); Reg. §§1.664-2(a)(3), 1.664-3(a)(3).

[3]  Reg. § 1.212-1(i).